Glick Report
  • November 3, 2009 03:24 PM EST by Alexis Glick

    Gettelfinger Discusses UAW's Rejection of Ford Contract

    This morning in a First on Fox Business I spoke to Ron Gettelfinger ,the UAW (United Auto Workers) president, about the UAW's vote against a deal with Ford. As you may recall on October 14th in a blog entitled, "Gettelfinger on Details of the UAW's Contract with Ford," I called the deal "lousy" for Ford UAW workers. Gettelfinger understandingly took some offense to that notion, saying, "I don't know exactly where you're coming from on that, Alexis. To us, this is a win-win for the company as well as for the workers."

    This morning, Gettelfinger kindly accepted my request to return and explain why the deal failed. As many as 70% of the production membership and 75% of the skilled trade members voted against the agreement. I replayed his "win win" prediction just 3 weeks ago. His response:

    "A gratification process is political as you know. We did not do a good job of selling it to our membership. We underestimated the fatigue if you will of the people constantly having to make a decision on a contract. But look, this was not a concessionary agreement and it was a win-win. It was a win for us and a win for the company. We had product commitments long term which would give us longer term job security. The people saw the three things in that agreement that bothered them. One was limited arbitration on wage and benefit improvements only and then mechanical skill traits teams and changes in the entry level, which would have put them on par with GM and Chrysler. But we overlooked and we were unable to convince our membership that this was in their best interest. But look, membership is the highest authority in our union, they have the final say and we respect that and we accept that. Having said that, Ford workers are going to continue to work very hard with Ford to make sure that they maintain the momentum that they have going because our membership wants this company to be profitable. If you go back and look at part of the reason for that it’s because the men and the women of the UAW have stood up repeatedly. If you put this in dollars and cents from a monetary standpoint, this means very little to Ford. Going forward it would have meant more to them, but compared to what we did, nearly ½ a billion dollars in Febuary 15, this was more just aligning the contract. But I got to say this. The MOA or the modern operating agreements that many many, infact most all of Ford locations have in place now, is also something that wasn’t in place at the other companies and a company come out ahead on. Our membership is working very very hard with Ford. If you look at their quality, if you look at their productivity. And this is just one little place in the road. We’ll move forward. It will not be an issue."

    One thing is crystal clear: the UAW needs the commitment from Ford on new product development and Ford needs a deal similar to GM and Chrysler to remain competitive. The problem for Ford is that the UAW has already made enormous concessions. A freeze or cap on entry-level wages and the failure to strike on wages and benefits caps the upside for all Ford UAW workers. Would you want your compensation capped through the end of 2011? Would you do that knowing that Ford has returned to profitability? Did you see Ford's better than expected guidance through 2011? At the end of the day they'll ratify an agreement. The question is who will get the upper hand.

Cory Martin

I cant stand listening to these Union leaders.. They are just parasites. They provide nothing for the workers but lower overall wages. If only the average worker could understand that because of the unions overhead their income goes down. Its sickening to think that people like Gettelfinger exploit the workers in our car factories.

November 4, 2009 at 5:06 pm

RobM1981

Two down, one to go. With the help of the Obama administration the UAW essentially stole the equity they now have in GM and Chrysler. As primary sharholders, it will be interesting to watch them eat their own young. The big question is "will Ford wait around until the UAW's death grip has them by the throat, or will they take actions to stop them?" Nobody wants to see jobs leave the USA, particularly now, but better that than a dead FoMoCo.

November 4, 2009 at 4:48 pm

Randy

Can't buy GM anymore since the company was confiscated by the government and given to the UAW. Chrysler has never been much of a choice and seem to be all but failed and gone. Now Ford has a greedy union out to finish it off. I had planned to buy from Ford to replace my GMC truck. Didn't think I would ever own a Jap truck, but things change. I will also keep buying over priced wonderfully well built BMW's.

November 4, 2009 at 3:44 pm

Carter

The author doesn't seem to understand that the unions are the problem for the what used to be the Big 3. They have soaked these companies to a crictal point. Point in case, the job banks. If the job banks weren't real it would make a wonderful urban legend. Sitting around at home making $60 and hour. I am less likely to buy a car from the Big 3 than I am a so-called foreign car. Honda, Hyundia, Toyota and Mercedes all have substantial presences in my state. No union need here.

November 4, 2009 at 2:30 pm

Andy Perez

That seems to be the problem with the auto industry and unions. Every time the industry starts to make a profit the union demands a bigger check. It seems to me to make it difficult for a company to control costs, manage for the future strenght of the company and strengthen the balance sheet for when times do get hard like now. thats why i was against the bailout. as soon as the industry starts to make money again the union will demand more. the cycle prevents efforst to strengthen the company

November 4, 2009 at 9:45 am

Rich Brown

RACE TO THE BOTTOM! Maybe FORD workers didn't want to play. seeing the way GM and Chryselor workers lost so badly on their concession contracts. Anyone with eyes would not trust UAW on anything containing their win/win launguage voteing no was simply their way of saying NO! if FORDs gonna move production they'll move production to get nickel on the dollar their paying now. But! that won't go on forever FORDS way today in INDIA parts workers are striking for fair wages. :)

November 3, 2009 at 8:42 pm

about this blog

  • Alexis Glick is an anchor for FOX Business Network. Prior to joining FOX, Glick served as a correspondent for the Today Show and co-anchored the third hour of that program. Before her stint at NBC News, she was the senior trading correspondent for CNBC and reported from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

most popular posts