<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Tax Code Needs an Overhaul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:08:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blu</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-2/#comment-4635</link>
		<dc:creator>blu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4635</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t need an &quot;income tax&quot;!  We sure don&#039;t need Forbe&#039;s flat tax. 
It is nobody&#039;s business how much anyone earns in their livelihood. 
The FairTax is a most ingenious plan that streamlines the funding of government and gets the government out of our personal lives. 
Get rid of the Gestapo IRS and bring in Trillions of dollars that sit offshore due to the &quot;income tax&quot;&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#039;t need an &quot;income tax&quot;!  We sure don&#039;t need Forbe&#039;s flat tax.<br />
It is nobody&#039;s business how much anyone earns in their livelihood.<br />
The FairTax is a most ingenious plan that streamlines the funding of government and gets the government out of our personal lives.<br />
Get rid of the Gestapo IRS and bring in Trillions of dollars that sit offshore due to the &quot;income tax&quot;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Demuth</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-1/#comment-4634</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Demuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4634</guid>
		<description>MIT has covered it all.  As I just mentioned as a comment in Richard&#039;s note above, the FairTax is the best answer to all of our problems with the tax system.  I would think that all of the recent Obama appointees would now agree. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIT has covered it all.  As I just mentioned as a comment in Richard&#039;s note above, the FairTax is the best answer to all of our problems with the tax system.  I would think that all of the recent Obama appointees would now agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Demuth</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-2/#comment-4633</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Demuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4633</guid>
		<description>Richard is right.........a simple flat tax, although better, is not enough.  My CPA also agrees that we need to support passage of the proposed FairTax, repeal the 16th amendment and abolish the IRS (we need them to go to work for the FBI).  After that, demand cuts in spending and balance the federal budget. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard is right&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;a simple flat tax, although better, is not enough.  My CPA also agrees that we need to support passage of the proposed FairTax, repeal the 16th amendment and abolish the IRS (we need them to go to work for the FBI).  After that, demand cuts in spending and balance the federal budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-1/#comment-4632</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4632</guid>
		<description>I agree with your major point, Alexis; the system is far too complex and should be discarded in favor of a simpler system. Some variation of Forbes&#039; idea has been on my radar for 30 years. The mortgage debacle we&#039;re in right now only reinforces the point because government incentives for being in debt rather unsurprisingly encourages too much spending, speculation, and irrational markets.  
 
I hear two powerful, fundamental barriers to reform, and both are basically political. First, First is the social engineering we do with taxes. Most people don&#039;t realize that abut 1/3 of the people pay no taxes, and a large percentage of them are actually getting money out of the system by credits. The new program will only exaggerate this abuse. I say we can choose to directly write checks to the lower income reaches of the economy. That is a variation of socialism, and we&#039;re doing it already; for my part, I don&#039;t like it but I believe in a democracy we can make those choices. The abusive part is to hide it behind a tax system.  
 
The other barrier comes from the middle and upper classes who feel they benefit from real estate deductions etc. They rightly believe that if tax benefits to home ownership were eliminated, the value of their real estate investments would drop. In other words, home costs are artificially inflated, ultimately benefiting only two industries: homebuilders and realtors. Why? Becasue if your house value goes up, so does the one you&#039;d like to buy, so we end up with people buying excessively large and expensive houses trying to game the system. Our country does not benefit from this, and we have to find a way to withdraw federal subsidies for homeownership.  
 
So what Congress has done is to co-opt political support from virtually everyone, such that we are all afraid to act. So far it has worked. In the meantime, they have packed the tax code with goodies and giveaways to anybody who offered a campaign contribution. Capitalizing on our fear, they have obscured real spending priorities and the real state of our government&#039;s finances. What we as citizens need to do is to overcome our fear and press for reform, trying to convince everyone we can that Congress must be FORCED to change. My proposal bears resemblance to what several others have suggested, including Mr. Forbes: 
 
1. Establish a level relative to the federal poverty level below which we do not tax. 
2. Calculate the total amount of revenue required to support the current year&#039;s spending approved by Congress. Proportion this amount by an agreed percentage between corporate and personal taxes. 
3. Simply estimate the total income of all Americans, and calculate the percentage of this sum that is required to balance the budget. 
4. In regard to capital gains not from farms and personal, primary housing (which should be exempt, in my view), allow the gain to be corrected for inflation based on CPI, then tax it as real income, which it is. 
5. No death tax. 
6. Real estate freebies are tough, but the distortion must end-- over time. I can&#039;t do the math here, but a system must be established to allow it to be phased out over, say, ten years.  
 
Your audience is smart and sophisticated, and I&#039;d love to hear some response.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your major point, Alexis; the system is far too complex and should be discarded in favor of a simpler system. Some variation of Forbes&#039; idea has been on my radar for 30 years. The mortgage debacle we&#039;re in right now only reinforces the point because government incentives for being in debt rather unsurprisingly encourages too much spending, speculation, and irrational markets.  </p>
<p>I hear two powerful, fundamental barriers to reform, and both are basically political. First, First is the social engineering we do with taxes. Most people don&#039;t realize that abut 1/3 of the people pay no taxes, and a large percentage of them are actually getting money out of the system by credits. The new program will only exaggerate this abuse. I say we can choose to directly write checks to the lower income reaches of the economy. That is a variation of socialism, and we&#039;re doing it already; for my part, I don&#039;t like it but I believe in a democracy we can make those choices. The abusive part is to hide it behind a tax system.  </p>
<p>The other barrier comes from the middle and upper classes who feel they benefit from real estate deductions etc. They rightly believe that if tax benefits to home ownership were eliminated, the value of their real estate investments would drop. In other words, home costs are artificially inflated, ultimately benefiting only two industries: homebuilders and realtors. Why? Becasue if your house value goes up, so does the one you&#039;d like to buy, so we end up with people buying excessively large and expensive houses trying to game the system. Our country does not benefit from this, and we have to find a way to withdraw federal subsidies for homeownership.  </p>
<p>So what Congress has done is to co-opt political support from virtually everyone, such that we are all afraid to act. So far it has worked. In the meantime, they have packed the tax code with goodies and giveaways to anybody who offered a campaign contribution. Capitalizing on our fear, they have obscured real spending priorities and the real state of our government&#039;s finances. What we as citizens need to do is to overcome our fear and press for reform, trying to convince everyone we can that Congress must be FORCED to change. My proposal bears resemblance to what several others have suggested, including Mr. Forbes: </p>
<p>1. Establish a level relative to the federal poverty level below which we do not tax.<br />
2. Calculate the total amount of revenue required to support the current year&#039;s spending approved by Congress. Proportion this amount by an agreed percentage between corporate and personal taxes.<br />
3. Simply estimate the total income of all Americans, and calculate the percentage of this sum that is required to balance the budget.<br />
4. In regard to capital gains not from farms and personal, primary housing (which should be exempt, in my view), allow the gain to be corrected for inflation based on CPI, then tax it as real income, which it is.<br />
5. No death tax.<br />
6. Real estate freebies are tough, but the distortion must end&#8211; over time. I can&#039;t do the math here, but a system must be established to allow it to be phased out over, say, ten years.  </p>
<p>Your audience is smart and sophisticated, and I&#039;d love to hear some response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disgusted</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-1/#comment-4627</link>
		<dc:creator>Disgusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4627</guid>
		<description>Continued.......We need to start taking care of our own.  I&#039;m not saying that we need to close our eyes or our hearts to others but I do believe that charity begins at home.  Why kill ourselves to put our kids through college when there are no jobs to be had?  Let&#039;s start beating up on those that take advantage of those in desperate need.  Take H&amp;R Block for example with their refund anticipation loans.  People are hurting.  The hear the commercials, they need money now so, they go to H&amp;R Block where as much as 40% of their refund is being charged as the fee.  It&#039;s even more at times.  These people are cutthroats, embezzlers and loan sharks.  Where is the compassion?  They should be put out of business.  Law makers need to start taking a good look at companies and their practices.  They need to start cracking down on those bottom feeders out there who are making the economy worse, not for themselves of course.  They are bringing in money hand over fist.  Let&#039;s get back to the basics that this country was founded on and make this country healthy again! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continued&#8230;&#8230;.We need to start taking care of our own.  I&#039;m not saying that we need to close our eyes or our hearts to others but I do believe that charity begins at home.  Why kill ourselves to put our kids through college when there are no jobs to be had?  Let&#039;s start beating up on those that take advantage of those in desperate need.  Take H&amp;R Block for example with their refund anticipation loans.  People are hurting.  The hear the commercials, they need money now so, they go to H&amp;R Block where as much as 40% of their refund is being charged as the fee.  It&#039;s even more at times.  These people are cutthroats, embezzlers and loan sharks.  Where is the compassion?  They should be put out of business.  Law makers need to start taking a good look at companies and their practices.  They need to start cracking down on those bottom feeders out there who are making the economy worse, not for themselves of course.  They are bringing in money hand over fist.  Let&#039;s get back to the basics that this country was founded on and make this country healthy again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disgusted</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-1/#comment-4626</link>
		<dc:creator>Disgusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4626</guid>
		<description>Lets think about this.  Our Government is the problem.  We have a major deficit.  Our country is in a recession.  When a disaster happens somewhere else in the world, we are there handing out financial and moral support.  When that hurricane hit Louisiana, those people were abandoned for the most part.  They would have been much better off if they lived outside this country.  It was other Americans that pitched in to help out, open up their homes, donated food and clothing.  It wasn&#039;t our Government.  We have so many people out of work.  So many people without medical insurance.  So many people losing their homes and can&#039;t afford to put food on the table to feed their families and what is our Government doing about it?  They&#039;re giving everyone on average another $13 a week in their paychecks.  Ok, that might cover the increase in price of a few groceries.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets think about this.  Our Government is the problem.  We have a major deficit.  Our country is in a recession.  When a disaster happens somewhere else in the world, we are there handing out financial and moral support.  When that hurricane hit Louisiana, those people were abandoned for the most part.  They would have been much better off if they lived outside this country.  It was other Americans that pitched in to help out, open up their homes, donated food and clothing.  It wasn&#039;t our Government.  We have so many people out of work.  So many people without medical insurance.  So many people losing their homes and can&#039;t afford to put food on the table to feed their families and what is our Government doing about it?  They&#039;re giving everyone on average another $13 a week in their paychecks.  Ok, that might cover the increase in price of a few groceries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Glodzd</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-1/#comment-4622</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Glodzd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4622</guid>
		<description>Since you long for the old days. Let&#039;s go back to the Eisenhower Era when the top tax bracket was 70%. A flat tax at that rate makes a lot of sense to me!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you long for the old days. Let&#039;s go back to the Eisenhower Era when the top tax bracket was 70%. A flat tax at that rate makes a lot of sense to me!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo N.</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-1/#comment-4621</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4621</guid>
		<description>The Fair Tax is the way to go.  No loop holes, no games-playing trying to lower your taxes, but also no constraints on growth, either pesonally or at the corporate level, which is what this country needs right now ... economic growth.  Implement the Fair Tax and watch this country prosper like it never has before. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fair Tax is the way to go.  No loop holes, no games-playing trying to lower your taxes, but also no constraints on growth, either pesonally or at the corporate level, which is what this country needs right now &#8230; economic growth.  Implement the Fair Tax and watch this country prosper like it never has before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIT</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-1/#comment-4620</link>
		<dc:creator>MIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4620</guid>
		<description>Read  &quot;The Fair Tax Book&quot; and &quot;The Fair Tax: The Truth&quot; by Congressman John Linder and Neal Boortz. The books are a quick read and inexpensive, approximately $15.00 each. If that is too much go to the library and get it, but GET THEM both. The Fair Tax is just that FAIR, everyone is treated the same no matter what income level. Listed below are just a few benefits of the Fair Tax:  
 
No federal income taxes, no payroll taxes, no self employment taxes, no capitol gains tax, no gift or estates taxes, no alternative minimum taxes, no corporate taxes, no payroll withholding, no taxes on social security, no personal tax forms, no personal or business income tax record keeping and no personal income tax filing. 
 
The federal government is funded through a national sales tax, the book suggest a rate of 23%, which is already embedded into every product we already purchase today. But everyone would pay it, honest people, drug dealers and illegal immigrants and so forth. 
 
Corporate money in the trillions, 13 trillion US dollars are sitting in offshore tax haven banks accounts to avoid the US tax code. That money  would come back to the US. Jobs would come back from overseas because they would know their tax liability at the start and not have to waste time and money determining the tax consequences of business decisions. 
 
Mr. Forbes is right, it is going to take the people of the US to band together to get this on the front page of every politician mind. Write your President, Senator and Congressman. Most politicians and all lobbyist are against the Fair Tax because it takes power from the government and stops the millions of dollars that lobbyist are paid to rig the current tax code to suit the highest bidder. 
 
Finally, Fox Business news needs to educate all their viewers and spread the word. Alexa Glick please get the ball rolling on a national level, this will only make America stronger and freer.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read  &quot;The Fair Tax Book&quot; and &quot;The Fair Tax: The Truth&quot; by Congressman John Linder and Neal Boortz. The books are a quick read and inexpensive, approximately $15.00 each. If that is too much go to the library and get it, but GET THEM both. The Fair Tax is just that FAIR, everyone is treated the same no matter what income level. Listed below are just a few benefits of the Fair Tax:  </p>
<p>No federal income taxes, no payroll taxes, no self employment taxes, no capitol gains tax, no gift or estates taxes, no alternative minimum taxes, no corporate taxes, no payroll withholding, no taxes on social security, no personal tax forms, no personal or business income tax record keeping and no personal income tax filing. </p>
<p>The federal government is funded through a national sales tax, the book suggest a rate of 23%, which is already embedded into every product we already purchase today. But everyone would pay it, honest people, drug dealers and illegal immigrants and so forth. </p>
<p>Corporate money in the trillions, 13 trillion US dollars are sitting in offshore tax haven banks accounts to avoid the US tax code. That money  would come back to the US. Jobs would come back from overseas because they would know their tax liability at the start and not have to waste time and money determining the tax consequences of business decisions. </p>
<p>Mr. Forbes is right, it is going to take the people of the US to band together to get this on the front page of every politician mind. Write your President, Senator and Congressman. Most politicians and all lobbyist are against the Fair Tax because it takes power from the government and stops the millions of dollars that lobbyist are paid to rig the current tax code to suit the highest bidder. </p>
<p>Finally, Fox Business news needs to educate all their viewers and spread the word. Alexa Glick please get the ball rolling on a national level, this will only make America stronger and freer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KnightRider007</title>
		<link>http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/02/06/our-tax-code-needs-an-overhaul/comment-page-1/#comment-4619</link>
		<dc:creator>KnightRider007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glickreport.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=1013#comment-4619</guid>
		<description>Alexis Congress has proven two points: policitians don&#039;t know jack about economics.Second they prove this quote from Lee Iaccoa: Goverment is a problem prolonge. Wouldn&#039;t u agree? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexis Congress has proven two points: policitians don&#039;t know jack about economics.Second they prove this quote from Lee Iaccoa: Goverment is a problem prolonge. Wouldn&#039;t u agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>