Glick Report
  • July 21, 2008 03:45 PM EDT by Alexis Glick

    The Future of 401(k) Plans

    Will employers that currently match employee contributions to 401(k) plans be a thing of the past? Some say yes. Some say no. Given the current economic climate and the fact that health care costs are rising, one study conducted by Yale and Harvard says that the money companies use to match contributions could be better used elsewhere and save companies money.

    According to my colleague at Dow Jones and my guest this morning on Money for Breakfast, Robert Powell, researchers are saying companies would be better off using the money they now put toward plan contributions, and instead use it to lower health care costs, minimize 401(k) plan fees and help pay for employee benefits. This, at a time, when employee benefits are rising, companies are cutting costs, wages and headcount. Just last week General Motors announced huge cost cutting efforts and changes to how they compensate their employees.  

    Will this happen across the board? Not so, according to another survey conducted by Hewitt Associates in Robert’s column entitled “Eliminating 401(k) Matches Might Actually Be a Savings Boon”  but is discouraging in light of the current economic environment. Companies need their employers to participate in these plans as many of them are either compensated in their companies stock or have bought into their pension plans. The companies use the shareholder or employee buy-in for things like buy backs which at the end of the day help the stock but in this environment the first thing companies look to do is cut benefits.  

    Is this the beginning of this story? My guess is yes. Two problems as I see it. One, wage deflation. Will companies who need to cut costs cut wages and in turn benefits or the other way around? With inflation at record levels that means not enough buying power. Two, more and more retirees and home owners at risk of default are borrowing from their 401k’s to get out of debt or because they didn’t plan for a downturn in the economy. At the end of the day, none of this is good and lends credence to those who say we are not contributing or preparing as aggressively for retirement as we should be. Imagine if your company now stops offering a plan to match your contributions. Keep an eye on that. If you’re not putting money toward your 401k and you company offers a matching plan, invest in it. It’s FREE MONEY. But, don’t make the mistake that too many have made by investing it all in your companies stock. DIVERSIFY, DIVERSIFY, DIVERSIFY!

     

     

Greedom

Yes, if real estate - localize- location location location and if stock - dislocate- diversify diversify diversify. I liked the real estate note on location taking precedence. from different article though. you people don't have a picture of Liz MacDonald up on the best team in business picture to the right of this text window I observe.

July 22, 2008 at 10:44 am

mc

Looks like the first thing Fox cut was proof readers. This article barely makes sense.

July 23, 2008 at 9:39 am

Brigitte Madrian

As one of the authors of the research study cited in the article, I would like to point out that our study does not state anywhere that "the money companies use to match contributions could be better used elsewhere and save companies money" as suggested in this article. Our study shows that in companies with automatic enrollment, participation rates are not very sensitive to the level of the employer match or to whether or not there is a match. It does not examine the impact of an employer match in companies without automatic enrollment--and the majority of firms with 401(k) plans do not use automatic enrollment. It makes no conclusions about whether the employer match constitutes an optimal or sub-optimal allocation of employer expenditures. It makes no assertions as stated in this article that employers would be better served by using their matching contributions to "lower health care costs, minimize 401(k) plan fees and help pay for employee benefits."

July 29, 2008 at 12:23 pm

about this blog

  • Alexis Glick is an anchor for FOX Business Network. Prior to joining FOX, Glick served as a correspondent for the Today Show and co-anchored the third hour of that program. Before her stint at NBC News, she was the senior trading correspondent for CNBC and reported from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

most popular posts