Glick Report
  • March 18, 2008 11:36 AM EDT by Alexis Glick

    Scoping out the Fed's Next Move

    This morning on The Opening Bell I interviewed Former Fed Governor and Director of Princeton’s Center for Economic Policy Studies, Alan Blinder. Take a look at the video below and the op-ed piece he wrote in this morning’s Washington Post. 

    On the show he told me that until last summer, most people hadn’t even heard of a subprime mortgage. “On a trend, it’s getting worse, not better, here we are into March and its enveloping all kinds of financial markets, even including the dollar. That kind of track suggests to me, and obviously suggests to the Fed also, that pretty decisive actions are needed on a broad front.”  

    He also said the Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson needs to play a more active role in easing the financial turmoil. “Whoever occupies that job is the chief financial officer of the United States, he is also a political appointee who can and does speak for the president so I think leadership really ought come from the top.,” he said.  “When it comes from putting taxpayer money on the line, whether they are actually spending it or putting it at risk which the Fed has now started to do, it really ought to be the Treasury, the administration or Congress that are doing this rather than the Federal Reserve.”

    031808_opening_fed_1.jpg

    031808_opening_fed2_1.jpg

    The Fed Can't Do It Alone
    By Alan S. Blinder - Tuesday, March 18, 2008; A19 The Washington Post

    Psychology has now overwhelmed economics. What started last summer as a serious problem in a little-known -- but not so little -- corner of the U.S. mortgage market has blossomed into a worldwide financial panic, the sort we read about in history books. Except within the Republican Party, laissez-fairy tales have been discarded, and government support is being both sought and given.

    The financial markets live or die on confidence. If you sell a security, you must believe the other guy will pay. You must also believe that something worth $30 at Friday's close, such as shares of Bear Stearns, will not be worth $2 at Monday's open. Such confidence looks to be draining from the system.

    Who can restore it? Once upon a time, it was J.P. Morgan -- the man, not the company. Today, it must be the world's leading central banks and treasuries, starting with our own.

    Unfortunately, this past weekend was a bad one for Team USA. On Friday, President Bush gave a speech at the Economic Club of New York that left people wondering whether he was in touch. On Sunday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who has been eerily silent as this crisis unfolded, made the rounds of the morning talk shows. It was not reassuring to see this former titan of Wall Street recite his talking points. Wolf Blitzer asked him five times, "Why did you bail out Bear Stearns?" He never got an answer.

    Actually, the Treasury didn't bail out Bear Stearns; the Federal Reserve did. Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Fed have been working overtime; they have slashed interest rates and lent or offered money to almost everyone potentially involved in this mess. On Sunday, the Fed even put its own balance sheet at risk to smooth the way for J.P. Morgan (the company, not the man) to "buy" Bear Stearns. But the stunningly low purchase price, far below even the value of Bear Stearns's Manhattan building, did not exactly inspire confidence.

    Earth to the White House and Congress: The Fed cannot do this job alone.

    But isn't the central bank the fabled "lender of last resort"? Yes, and the Fed is performing that role extensively. But central banks are designed to lend money to banks that are illiquid but not insolvent. It is not supposed to spend taxpayer money or even put much of it at risk. Those political decisions are properly made by elected leaders.

    So what can be done now?

    Click here to read the rest of the article from the Washington Post

chuck harrison

Now that the Federal Reserve has cut the rate %0.75 is this going help or hurt. Last night I was watching Cavuto on the Bear Stearns issue and Donald Trump commented that the Fed was doing the right thing with interest rates. But he pointed out the fact that the Fed should've been more agressive much earlier. But with the subprime and credit beast hopping around the global marketplace, is to little or too late? The last time the Fed cut rates to 0% was back in 1979 AD. Now will Bernacke be more agreesive with the problem in the futute now?

March 18, 2008 at 2:40 pm

brendan reilly

OK…the real question for Bear Sterns stock holders is – “What is the relationship between the Federal Reserve Bank and JP Morgan?” A little know fact, but JP Morgan is one of the largest stockholders (owners) of the Federal Reserve Bank. In fact JP Morgan receives a dividend each year (last year in excess of $250m, more than the purchase price of BSC) from the FED. Fact: The FED is not a government entity and Ben Bernanke does not work for the US Government. Mr. Bernanke works for the owners/stockholders of the Feral Reserve Bank…i.e. he works for JP Morgan…. Question did Mr. Bernanke step over the line to help out one of his stockholders (JP Morgan)?

March 18, 2008 at 1:55 pm

greg mullin

Alexis This has nothing to do with this discuission but i always wondered why when something like a bank has a problem why does it bring down everybody else such as say a home depot? Thanks

March 18, 2008 at 1:44 pm

Art

This is such an interesting time. What is the Fed's mandate? Growth? Strong dollar? Low Inflation? The Fed has chosen to pump up the economy and I think they are wise to do so. Supporting the dollar can come via other means, as Alan pointed out. The Fed must deal with this liquidity crisis and looming recession that could quickly intensify into a depression. Thank god the Fed has the flexibility to act aggressively and has chosen to do so! I'm sure Ron Paul and his supporters are foaming at the mouth, but if we don't stave off a dramatic financial meltdown, we'll all be taken down with the ship. It's about priorities and I think Bernanke has chosen wisely. Yes, the Fed's actions are potentially inflationary and there will be future repercussions. A strong dollar is necessary, but if the economy tanks, the dollar will fall in kind. In the meantime, a weak dollar is helping narrow the trade gap and boosting growth and jobs. A patient is lying on the table. First make sure he's breathing, then stop the bleeding. After that, we can tend to the broken bones.

March 18, 2008 at 1:43 pm

about this blog

  • Alexis Glick is an anchor for FOX Business Network. Prior to joining FOX, Glick served as a correspondent for the Today Show and co-anchored the third hour of that program. Before her stint at NBC News, she was the senior trading correspondent for CNBC and reported from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

most popular posts