Glick Report
  • March 17, 2008 06:23 AM EDT by Alexis Glick

    Comparing Bear and Lehman

    Last Monday morning on Money For Breakfast in our America's Biggest Business Rivals series, (which we air every Monday), we profiled Bear Stearns vs. Lehman Brothers. To say that the decision to pit them against one another was slightly controversial is an understatement! We contacted both Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers to make sure that we had all of the proper history on the each of the respective companies. Lehman, once they understood what we were doing, was not happy with us! They felt a comparison to Bear Stearns was inaccurate and that the proper comparable was Goldman Sachs.

    After contacting several of my colleagues on Wall Street (who covered the broker dealers as Wall Street analysts), studying their history and reviewing their financials, I made the determination that BSC vs. LEH was the right comparison in this group. Was it a perfect comp? No. Lehman's market capitalization at the time was three times that of Bear Stearns, Lehman was not at risk of insolvency and Lehman placed much higher on almost every table measuring mergers and acquisitions, fixed income and equities. But America's Greatest Business Rivals is not just a measure of today. It's a measure of the history of two companies, how they have competed with one another throughout history, their corporate culture and their brand.
    They're both run by iconoclasts, started and were primarily known for their fixed-income businesses and were the smaller broker dealers in the business with less global exposure than some of their counterparts.

    As we wake up this morning and read the headlines about J.P. Morgan's acquisition of Bear Stearns, rumblings about whether Lehman is next have begun to take center stage. Lehman will report earnings tomorrow. What happened to Bear Stearns in the early part of last week happened to Lehman on Friday. In the credit-default-swaps market on Friday morning, Lehman's paper widened by 65 basis points in the wake of the Bear Stearns news. The implied volatility in Lehman's options shot up 76% to 113.8% with record level put buying in the March contracts at 35, 40 and 45. What does this mean? Investors (whether they be hedge funds, individuals or owners of the stock) are worried about the financial health and well being of Lehman. They are buying downside protection by purchasing puts and betting that the stock will go lower. The implied volatility, which measures sentiment, and activity in those options shot up because the level of put purchases spiked. Remember when we talk about the VIX or the Volatility Index, we talk about the measure of volatility or downside protection in the market. Watch VIX prices today. When the VIX spikes, the market tends to the opposite. It may signal that we are near a bottom!

chuck harrison

I just read off the Yahoo news wire that Lehman Brothers had fall in profits. Question are they headed toward the same fate as their competitor rival Bear Stearns?

March 18, 2008 at 2:59 pm

E. W. Harris

When are our lawmakers and regulators going to start holding these clowns (officers/board) at our financial institution such as Bear Stearns accountable for their lies in reporting their true financial status to shareholders and future investors. The people that really get hurt in shams such as Bear Stearns are the investors, the laid-off employees (14000) and the roiled markets in general, as they affect the public's 401K's, retirement incomes, etc. Bear Stearns is allowed to be acquired in a weekend off-market (read: other investors could not participate) deal at a ridiculous price/share ($2) by another yet-to-be-exposed sham perpetrator, JP Morgan Chase. All this while the clowns in the executive suite and board rooms at Bear Stearns are allowed to keep their extravagant compensation and outlandish bonuses for a "job well done". In my opinion, they should be led away in handcuffs ala Andy Fastow and Jeffrey Skilling (Enron). Obviously, the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation is a joke when it comes to truthful reporting and transparency by our financial institutions.

March 17, 2008 at 11:01 am

Chris

Very Prescient!

March 17, 2008 at 9:02 am

about this blog

  • Alexis Glick is an anchor for FOX Business Network. Prior to joining FOX, Glick served as a correspondent for the Today Show and co-anchored the third hour of that program. Before her stint at NBC News, she was the senior trading correspondent for CNBC and reported from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

most popular posts